Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLewis, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T17:13:25Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T17:13:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationIJ-CCCLXXXVI-876en_US
dc.identifier.issn2718-8655
dc.identifier.urihttps://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/1432
dc.descriptionEs una publicación realizada en colaboración con la Universidad Austral.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this Note is to explore the topic of manifest disregard of the law as a continuing basis for vacatur of awards after the recent Supreme Court decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.1 In the first part this Note will examine the origins and historical application of the manifest disregard of the law standard of judicial review of arbitration awards. Secondly, the Note will discuss Hall Street and its prodigy in relation to current status of extra-statutory judicial review of US arbitral awards.en_US
dc.language.isoesen_US
dc.publisherIJ Editoresen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista argentina de arbitraje;no. 1, 2017
dc.subjectArbitrajeen_US
dc.subjectControl judicial del arbitrajeen_US
dc.titleSalvaging Manifest Disregard of the Law in American Arbitration. Prospects and Possibilities for Expanded Grounds of Judicial Review after Hall Street Associates v. Mattel Inc.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record