Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZanotti, Gabriel J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-30T12:59:54Z
dc.date.available2017-03-30T12:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationZanotti, G. J. (2001). The Finn--Gronbacher debate. Journal of Markets and Morality, 4(2).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-1217
dc.identifier.urihttps://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/410
dc.descriptionPublicado con la autorización del autores
dc.description.abstractAs is known to readers of this journal, Gregory Gronbacher and Daniel Finn have engaged in an interesting dialogue about economic personalism. It is not my intention to review here all that they have written. My objective is to show that their dialogue not only touches upon key aspects of the Christianity—classical liberalism debate but also that it is fruitful in itself, since it leads to a series of additional considerations that enhance our understanding of economic personalism. These additional considerations will not be concerned with the details and divergences in Gronbacher’s and Finn’s respective positions. Instead, I will attempt to make clear the “horizons of understanding” that informs their writing. In doing so, it will be possible, using Gadamer’s terminology, to establish a fusion of horizons.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Markets & Moralityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 4, no. 2, 2001;
dc.subjectCristianismoes
dc.subjectLiberalismoes
dc.subjectGronbacheres
dc.subjectFinnes
dc.subjectPersonalismo económicoes
dc.titleThe Finn-Gronbacher Debateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record