Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSierre, Sergio.
dc.contributor.authorDe gregorio, Miguel.
dc.contributor.authorGuirola, Jose.
dc.contributor.authorEt al.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-16T15:52:25Z
dc.date.available2024-04-16T15:52:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.citationCVIR Endovasc . 2020 May 18;3(1):26.es
dc.identifier.issn2520-8934
dc.identifier.urihttps://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/3163
dc.descriptionDisponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7231811/pdf/42155_2020_Article_114.pdfes
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: The treatment of venous thromboembolic disease the treatment of choice is systemic anticoagulation. However, the interruption of the inferior vena cava with filters has been recommended when anticoagulation fails or there is a contraindication. Due to the rising inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) complications, physicians are encouraged to retrieve them when there is no longer recommended. In daily practice, it may be a difficult close follow-up of these patients. In this study, the primary objective was to evaluate the IVCF retrieval rate of all implanted filters in a Spanish registry. Secondary objectives were to analyze the causes of failed retrieval, procedure-related complications, and outcomes at a 12-month follow-up. Results: Three hundred fifty-six vena cava filters were implanted in 355 patients. The types of filter were: Gunther Tulip (Cook Medical) 160 (44.9%), Optease (Cordis) 77 (21.6%), Celect (Cook Medical) 49 (13, 7%), Aegisy (Lifetech Scientific) 33 (9.2%), Option ELITE (Argon Medical devices) 16 (4.4%), Denali filter (BD Bard) 11 (3.08%), ALN filter (ALN) 10 (2.8%). Removal was achieved in 274/356 (76,9%). eighty-two (23,1%) IVCF were not retrieved due to the following: 41 (11,5%) patients required ongoing filtration, 24 IVCF (6,7%) patients died before retrieval, and 17 (4,7%) impossibility of retrieval because of a tilted and embedded filter apex. There were no major complications observed. Conclusions: The global retrieval rate of IVCF was achieved in 76.9%, and the adjusted retrieval rate was of 94.15% with no major complications. IVCF tilting was associated with failure of filter removal in less than 5% of cases. This study demonstrates that the retrieval procedure of IVCF is controlled by the clinician and not by the interventional radiologist. Keywords: Inferior vena cava filters; Retrievable filters; Venous thrombotic disease (VTD). PubMed Disclaimeres
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherSpringerOpen [Commercial Publisher]es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectInferior vena cava filterses
dc.subjectRetrievable filterses
dc.subjectVenous thrombotic disease (VTD)es
dc.titleSpanish multicenter real - life registry of retrievable vena cava filters (REFiVeC)es
dc.typeArticlees


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional