Sports Arbitration: The decision of the Munich Higher Court in the Pechstein case: New tendencies in Sports Arbitration?

dc.contributor.author	Jaroslavsky, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned	2024-02-07T16:00:24Z
dc.date.available	2024-02-07T16:00:24Z
dc.date.issued	2016-05
dc.identifier.citation	IJ-XCVII-969	es
dc.identifier.issn	2422-5754
dc.identifier.uri	https://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/2732
dc.description.abstract	The purpose of this essay is to analyze the Pechstein saga[1], with special focus on the latest decision of the Munich Higher Regional Court from 15 January 2015.[2] In order to do so, it goes in first place through (I) the background of the dispute; and then, it analyzes (II) the decision of the Munich Higher Regional Court regarding (A) the jurisdiction of the German Courts over the claims, and the findings over (B) the validity of the arbitration agreement and (C) the res judicata effect of the CAS awards.	es
dc.language.iso	es	es
dc.publisher	Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Austral	es
dc.relation.ispartofseries	No. 12, 2016;
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Derecho del deporte	es
dc.title	Sports Arbitration: The decision of the Munich Higher Court in the Pechstein case: New tendencies in Sports Arbitration?	es
dc.type	Article	es

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional