Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSade, Juan P.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Fernando.
dc.contributor.authorSchutz, Fabio.
dc.contributor.authorEt al.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T15:01:38Z
dc.date.available2023-06-23T15:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifier.citationJCO Glob Oncol . 2021 Apr;7:538-544.es
dc.identifier.issn2687-8941
dc.identifier.urihttps://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/2200
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162965/pdf/go-7-go.20.00508.pdf
dc.descriptionDisponible en: https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/GO.20.00508?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmedes
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose: To present a summary of the treatment and follow-up recommendations for the biochemical recurrence in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) acquired through a questionnaire administered to 99 PCa experts from developing countries during the Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countries. Methods: A total of 27 questions were identified as related to this topic from more than 300 questions. The clinician's responses were tallied and presented in a percentage format. Topics included the use of imaging for staging biochemical recurrence, treatment recommendations for three different clinical scenarios, the field of radiation recommended, and follow-up. Each question had 5-7 relevant response options, including "abstain" and/or "unqualified to answer," and investigated not only recommendations but also if a limitation in resources would change the recommendation. Results: For most questions, a clear majority (> 50%) of clinicians agreed on a recommended treatment for imaging, treatment scenarios, and follow-up, although only a few topics reached a consensus > 75%. Limited resources did affect several areas of treatment, although in many cases, they reinforced more stringent criteria for treatment such as prostate-specific antigen values > 0.2 ng/mL and STAMPEDE inclusion criteria as a basis for recommending treatment. Conclusion: A majority of clinicians working in developing countries with limited resources use similar cutoff points and selection criteria to manage patients treated for biochemically recurrent castration-sensitive PCa.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncologyes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectProstate Cancer.es
dc.subjectCastration prostate cancer.es
dc.subjectBiochemical Recurrence.es
dc.titleConsensus on Treatment and Follow-Up for Biochemical Recurrence in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Report From the First Global Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference for Developing Countrieses
dc.typeArticlees


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record