dc.contributor.author | Crespo, Ricardo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-08T14:34:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-08T14:34:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Crespo, R. F. (2013). Two conceptions of economics and maximisation. Cambridge journal of economics, 37(4), 759-774. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/354 | |
dc.description.abstract | Economics has evolved from a ‘domain-focused’ conception, i.e. the study of specific kinds of human activities, to a ‘scarcity-based’ conception, i.e. the study of a particular approach to all human choices. It thus enlarged its domain and narrowed its perspective: instrumental maximising. This paper maintains that economics should be domain focused, with a core of scarcity-based analysis of its domain, integrated into a broader analysis. It also holds that the scarcity-based analysis of realities falling outside the economic domain is not economics, but rather a social science broader in respect to the field but narrower in respect to the analysis, and thus partial in its conclusions. Section 2 introduces these versions of economics, Section 3 links them to specific conceptions of rationality, Section 4 provides arguments for the paper’s thesis and Section 5 deals with two related versions of maximisation and argues for adopting one of them. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge Journal of Economics 2013, 37, 759–774 doi:10.1093/cje/bes076 | en_US |
dc.subject | Definition of economics | en_US |
dc.subject | Definition of maximisation | en_US |
dc.subject | Relation with other social sciences | en_US |
dc.title | Two Conceptions of Economics and Maximization | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |