Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCavasotto, Claudio.
dc.contributor.authorScardino, Valeria.
dc.contributor.authorBollini, Mariela.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T15:38:13Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T15:38:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.identifier.citationRSC Adv . 2021 Nov 2;11(56):35383-35391es
dc.identifier.issn2046-2069
dc.identifier.urihttps://riu.austral.edu.ar/handle/123456789/2169
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/RA/D1RA05785E
dc.descriptionDisponible en: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/RA/D1RA05785Ees
dc.description.abstractAbstract The use of high-throughput docking (HTD) in the drug discovery pipeline is today widely established. In spite of methodological improvements in docking accuracy (pose prediction), scoring power, ranking power, and screening power in HTD remain challenging. In fact, pose prediction is of critical importance in view of the pose-dependent scoring process, since incorrect poses will necessarily decrease the ranking power of scoring functions. The combination of results from different docking programs (consensus scoring) has been shown to improve the performance of HTD. Moreover, it has been also shown that a pose consensus approach might also result in database enrichment. We present a new methodology named Pose/Ranking Consensus (PRC) that combines both pose and ranking consensus approaches, to overcome the limitations of each stand-alone strategy. This approach has been developed using four docking programs (ICM, rDock, Auto Dock 4, and PLANTS; the first one is commercial, the other three are free). We undertook a thorough analysis for the best way of combining pose and rank strategies, and applied the PRC to a wide range of 34 targets sampling different protein families and binding site properties. Our approach exhibits an improved systematic performance in terms of enrichment factor and hit rate with respect to either pose consensus or consensus ranking alone strategies at a lower computational cost, while always ensuring the recovery of a suitable number of ligands. An analysis using four free docking programs (replacing ICM by Auto Dock Vina) displayed comparable results. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCombination of pose.es
dc.subjectRank consensus in docking-based virtual screening.es
dc.titleCombination of pose and rank consensus in docking-based virtual screening: the best of both worldses
dc.typeArticlees


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional